Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 47, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2012
Page(s) 271 - 284
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2012009
Published online 04 July 2012
  • Alghamdi A.A., Ma A., Tzortzis M., Spyrou N.M. (2005) Neutron Fluence To Dose Conversion Coefficients In An Anthropomorphic Phantom, Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 115, 606-611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bozkurt A., Chao T.C., Xu X.G. (2000) Fluence to dose conversion coefficients from monoenergetic neutrons below 20 MeV based on VIPMAN anatomical model, Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3059-79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Briesmeister J.F. (2000) Editor mcnptm – a general Monte Carlo N-particle transports code: version 4-C. Report LA-13709-M, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos, NM, 1-427. [Google Scholar]
  • Cristy M. (1980) Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose. ORNL/NUREG/TM-367, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, TN. [Google Scholar]
  • Cristy M., Eckerman K.F. ( 1987) Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources, Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL/TM-8381/V1. [Google Scholar]
  • Eckerman K.F., Cristy M., Ryman J.C. (1996) The ORNL mathematical phantom series, informal paper, OakRidge, TN:Oak Ridge National Laboratory. available at http://homer.hsr.ornl.gov/VLab/mird2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (1977) Publication 26, ICRP 1977, Oxford, Pergamon, 1-378. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (1987) Publication 51, Data for Use in Protection Against External Radiation, Oxford, Pergamon, 1-130. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (1991) Publication 60, Recommendations of ICRP. Oxford, Pergamon, 1-201. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (1995) Publication 74, Conversion Coefficients for use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation, Oxford, Pergamon, 1-205. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2003) Publication 92, Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), Quality Factor (Q), and Radiation Weighting Factor (wR), Oxford, Pergamon, 1-121. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2007) Publication 103, The 2007 Recommendations of ICRP, Elsevier, 1-332. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Lee J.K. (2006) Computational Anthropomorphic For Radiation Protection Dosimetry: Evolution, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 38, 239-50. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Nagaoka T., Lee J.K. (2006) Implementation of Japanese Male and Female Tomographic Phantoms to Multi-particle Monte Carlo Code for Ionizing Radiation Dosimetry. J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 43, 937-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Lee C., Eun Young H. (2007) Consideration of the ICRP 2006 revised tissue weighting factors on age-dependent values of the effective dose for external photons, Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 41-58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Manger R.P., Bellamy M.B., Eckerman K.F. (2011) Dose Conversation Coefficients For Neutron Exposure To The Lens Of The Human Eye, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 29 April: 1-7. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Miri H., L. Rafat M. (2007) Evaluation of specific absorbed fractions from internal photon sources in ORNL analytical adult phantom, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 128, 427-31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Miri H., L. Rafat M., K. Karimi S. (2009) Assessment of neutron fluence to organ dose conversion coefficients in the ORNL analytical adult phantom, JRP, 29, 51-60. [Google Scholar]
  • Sato T., Endo A., Zankl M. et al. (2009) Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for neutrons and protons calculated using the- PHITS code and ICRP/ICRU adult reference computational phantoms, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 1997-2014. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ulanovsky A.V., Eckerman K.F. (1998) Absorbed fractions for electron and photon emissions in the developing thyroid fetus to five years old, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 79, 419–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.