Free Access
Volume 46, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2011
Page(s) 443 - 456
Section Articles
Published online 16 December 2011
  • Adamson A.W. (1976) Physical chemistry of surfaces (J. Wiley & Sons, Ed.) New York, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR (2005) Mesure de la radioactivité dans l’environnement – eau : mesurage de l’activité et de la concentration de l’uranium dans l’eau par spectrométrie alpha. [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Asheh S.,Duvnjak Z. (1998) Binary metal sorption by pine bark: study of equilibria and mechanisms, Separ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1303-1329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aoyama M.,Honma S.,Kasai A.,Iseda Y.,Nakajima A.,Sakaguchi T. (1991) Uranium uptake by conifer leaves, Holzforschung 45, 75-77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aoyama M.,Seki K.,Sensho H.,Kasai A. (1993) Adsorption of heavy metal ions by hardwood barks, Cellulose Chem. Technol. 27, 39-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Deshkar A.M.,Bokade S.S.,Dara S.S. (1990) Modified Hardwickia binata bark for adsorption of mercury (II) from water, Wat. Res. 24, 1011-1016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Desjardins R. (1988) Le traitement des eaux (École Polytechnique de Montréal, Ed.) Montréal, 366. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaballah I.,Goy D.,Allain E.,Kilbertus G.,Thauront J. (1997) Recovery of copper through decontamination of synthetic solutions using modified barks, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 28, 13-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gloaguen V.,Morvan H. (1997) Removal of heavy ions from aqueous solution by modified barks, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 32, 901-912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haleem Khan M.,Warwick P.,Evans N. (2006) Spectrophotometric determination of uranium with arsenazo-III in perchloric acid, Chemosphere 63, 1165-1169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jansson-Charrier M., Guibal E., Surjous R., Le Cloirec P. (1995) Continuous removal of uranium by biosorption onto chitosan: application to an industrial effluent, in: Biohydrometallurgical processing (C.A. Jerez, T. Vargas, H. Toledo, J.V. Wiertz, Eds.) pp. 257-266, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar P.,Dara S.S. (1980) Modified barks for scavenging toxic heavy metal ions, Ind. J. Environ. Health 22, 196-202. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin-Dupont F.,Gloaguen V.,Granet R.,Guilloton M.,Krausz P. (2004) Chemical modifications of Douglas fir bark, a lignocellulosic by-products - Enhancement of their lead (II) binding capacities, Separ. Sci. Technol. 39, 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin-Dupont F., Gloaguen V., Granet R., Guilloton M., Morvan H., Krausz P. (2002) Heavy metal adsorption by crude coniferous barks: a modeling study, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 37, 1063-1073. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Randall J.,Berman R.L.,Garrett V.,Waiss A.C. (1974) Use of bark to remove metal ions from waste solutions, Forest Prod. 24, 80-84. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider I.A.H., Rubio J. (1995) New trends in biosorption of heavy metals by freshwater macrophytes, in: Biohydrometallurgical processing (C.A. Jerez, T. Vargas, H. Toledo, J.V. Wiertz, Eds.) pp. 247-256, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. [Google Scholar]
  • Seki K.,Saito N.,Aoyama M. (1997) Removal of heavy metal ions from solutions by coniferous barks, Wood Sci. Technol. 31, 441-447. [Google Scholar]
  • Veglio F.,Beolchini F.,Gasbarro A. (1997) Biosorption of toxic metals: an equilibrium study using free cells of Arthrobacter sp., Process Biochem. 32, 99-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Volesky B. (1986) Biosorbent materials, Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 16, 121-126. [Google Scholar]
  • Waiss A.C. Jr.,Wiley M.E.,Kuhnle J.A.,Potter A.L.,McCready R.M. (1973) Adsorption of mercuric cation by tannins in agricultural residues, J. Environ. Qual. 2, 369-371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber W.J.P. (1972) Physicochemical processes for water quality control (J. Wiley & Sons, Ed.) New York, 200. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.