Free Access
Volume 46, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2011
Page(s) 59 - 73
Section Articles
Published online 09 March 2011
  • Afsset (2009) Mise à jour de l’expertise relative aux radiofréquences. Saisine 2007/007. Octobre 2009. Afsset, Maisons Alfort. Consultable en ligne, 18 septembre 2010 : [Google Scholar]
  • Amalberti R. (2009) L’impact des nouvelles technologies sur le risque, Revue de l’ASN, n° 185, décembre 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnett J., Timotijevic L., Shepherd R. (2007) Public responses to precautionary information from the Department of Health (UK) about possible health risks from mobile phones, Health Policy 82, 240-250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brewer N.T., Hallman W.K., Kipen H.M. (2008) The symmetry rule: a seven-year study of symptoms and explanatory labels among Gulf War veterans, Risk Analysis 28, 1737-1748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bronner G., Géhin E. (2010) L’inquiétant principe de précaution. PUF, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Brownlee S., Leventhal H., Leventhal E.A. (2000) Regulation, self-regulation, and construction of the self in the maintenance of physical health. In: Handbook of Self-Regulation. Research, theory and applications (M. Boekartz, P.R. Pintrick, M. Zeidner, Eds.) pp. 369-393. Elsevier Academy Press, San Diego. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardis E. et al. (2010) Brain tumor risk in relation to mobile phone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case control study, Int. J. Epidemiol. 39, (17 mai 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • Dab W. (2010) Les syndromes, médicalement inexpliqués attribués à l’environnement : un révélateur de la relation entre l’environnement et la santé, Sciences Sociales et Santé 28, 35-40. [Google Scholar]
  • Hubert P. (2000) Approche comparée de quelques évolutions de la gestion du risque en France à travers l’organisation des Agences. Dans : Séminaire Risques collectifs et situations de crise, 27 avril 2000, École des Mines de Paris, séance 17 (C. Gilbert, Ed.) pp. 53-78. CNRS, Grenoble. [Google Scholar]
  • ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Phys. 74, 494-522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen J.B., Elstein A., Gyrd-Hansen D., Kildemoes H.W., Kristiansen I.S., Stovring H. (2010) Effects of Alternative Styles of Risk Information on EMF Risk Perception, Bioelectromagnetics 31, 504-512. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • OCDE (2008) L’OCDE en chiffres - Édition 2008. Paris : Les éditions de l’OCDE. [Google Scholar]
  • Pidgeon N., Kasperson R., Slovic P. (2003) The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Poortinga W., Cox P., Pidgeon N. (2008) The Perceived Health Risks of Indoor Radon Gas and Overhead Powerlines: A Comparative Multilevel Approach, Risk Analysis 28, 235-248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Renn O. (2008) Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan Publication Ltd, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Rubin J.G., Nieto-Hernandez R., Wessely S. (2010) Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly “electromagnetic hypersensitivity”): An updated systematic review of provocation studies, Bioelectromagnetics 31, 1-11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Selye H. (1975) Le stress de la vie. 2e édn. Gallimard, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Slovic P. (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan Publication Ltd, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Veyret B. (2010) Les communications sans fil et les radiofréquences, Dans : Champs électromagnétiques, environnement et santé (A. Perrin et M. Soucques, Eds.) pp. 69-86. Verlag, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiedemann P.M., Schütz H. (2005) The precautionary principle and risk perception: experimental studies in the EMF area, Environm. Health Persp. 113, 402-405 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • WHO (1958) Mental Health Aspects of the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. Report of a Study Group. Technical Report Series N° 151. World Health Organization, Genève. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.