Open Access

Table 4

PEMAT-P item scores among artificial intelligence chatbot and web search.

Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Web Search


Normal level 6th Grade Level



ChatGPT-3.5 Copilot Gemini ChatGPT-3.5 Copilot Gemini Google







n % AR n % AR n % AR n % AR n % AR n % AR n % AR
Understandability
 Content
  1 The material makes its purpose completely evident 30 100.0 2.7 32 100.0 2.7 29 100.0 2.6 29 100.0 2.6 30 96.8 2.2 26 92.9 1.5 117 66.1 −8.0
  2 The material does not include information or content that distracts from its purpose 30 100.0 1.2 32 100.0 1.2 29 100.0 1.2 29 100.0 1.2 28 90.3 −1.6 25 89.3 −1.8 168 94.9 −0.8
 Word Choice & Style
  3 The material uses common, everyday language 14 46.7 −1.0 20 62.5 0.9 19 65.5 1.2 25 86.2 3.5 24 77.4 2.6 27 96.4 4.6 67 37.9 −6.5
  4 Medical terms are defined when they are used 14 46.7 −0.9 16 50.0 −0.5 16 55.2 0.1 20 69.0 1.6 25 80.6 3.1 27 96.4 4.6 76 42.9 −4.4
 Use of Numbers
  5 Numbers appearing in the material are clear and easy to understanda 0 0.0 2 20.0 −1.0 1 20.0 −0.7 1 100.0 1.4 5 35.7 0.1 1 50.0 0.5 42 34.7 0.4
  6 The material does not expect the user to perform calculationsa 30 100.0 0.9 32 100.0 0.9 29 100.0 0.9 29 100.0 0.9 31 100.0 0.9 28 100.0 0.8 169 95.5 −2.9
 Organization
  7 The material breaks or "chunks" information into short section 66 56.9 0.0
  8 The material's sections have informative headers 81 69.2 0.0
  9 The material presents information in a logical sequence 30 100.0 0.5 32 100.0 0.5 29 100.0 0.5 29 100.0 0.5 30 96.8 −1.5 28 100.0 0.5 175 98.9 −0.6
  10 The material provides a summary 18 15.4 0.0
 Layout & Design
  11 The material uses visual cues to draw attention to key points 5 16.7 −3.3 23 71.9 3.1 29 100.0 6.1 2 6.9 −4.4 25 80.6 4.1 28 100.0 6.0 51 28.8 −6.4
 Use of Visual Aids
  12 The material uses visual aids whenever they could make content more easily understood 0 0.0 −3.5 0 0.0 −3.6 0 0.0 −3.5 0 0.0 −3.5 0 0.0 −3.6 0 0.0 −3.4 97 55.4 11.7
  13 The material's visual aids reinforce rather than distract from the content 110 77.5
  14 The material's visual aids have clear titles or captions 95 66.4
  15 The material uses illustrations and photographs that are clear and uncluttered 60 42.0
  16 The material uses simple tables with short and clear row and column headingsa 46 90.2
 Actionability
  17 The material clearly identifies at least one action the user can take 2 6.7 0.7 0 0.0 −1.2 4 13.8 2.7 1 3.4 −0.2 1 3.2 −0.3 3 10.7 1.8 4 2.3 −1.8
  18 The material addresses the user directly when describing actions 0 0.0 −0.9 0 0.0 −0.9 2 6.9 1.8 0 0.0 −0.9 1 3.2 0.4 2 7.1 1.8 3 1.7 −0.7
  19 The material breaks down any action into manageable, explicit steps 0 0.0 −1.0 0 0.0 −1.0 4 13.8 3.7 0 0.0 −1.0 1 3.2 0.1 1 3.6 0.3 4 2.3 −0.6
  20 The material provides a tangible tool whenever it could help the user take action 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
  21 The material provides simple instructions or examples of how to perform calculationsa 0 0.0
  22 The material explains how to use the charts, graphs, tables, or diagrams to take actionsa 0 0.0
  23 The material uses visual aids whenever they could make it easier to act on the instructions 0 0.0 −0.3 0 0.0 −0.3 0 0.0 −0.3 0 0.0 −0.3 0 0.0 −0.3 0 0.0 −0.3 1 0.6 1.0

aIncluding not applicable to the response method; AR = adjusted residuals; Significant difference if adjusted residuals are greater than or less than 1.96 (p < 0.05).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.