Open Access
Table 1
Main challenges associated with transparency during a nuclear or radiological emergency in MS. Source of data: Perko and Martell (2019).
| Challenge associated with transparency during a nuclear or radiological emergency | Countries identifying this challenge associated with transparency |
|---|---|
| Proper information | Hungary, Ireland, Cyprus, Poland, Czech Republic |
| Timeliness of information | Cyprus, Estonia, Spain, Czech Republic |
| Avoiding panic | Austria, Bulgaria, Germany |
| Amount of information | Finland, Poland |
| Reliability of information | Croatia, Italy |
| Avoiding rumours | Sweden |
| Controlled and direct provision of information | Czech Republic |
| Balance between truth and frightening people | France |
| Avoiding confusion, unsettlement, contradictory information Balance between transparency and reliable communication |
Germany |
| Maintain public trust in stress moments and get the main message across | Greece |
| Availability of information | Latvia |
| Security | Croatia |
| Different framework of understanding and identifying public concerns about safety and security issues | Lithuania |
| Balance between the right to be informed and regulations | Spain |
| Plain language | Poland |
| No particular challenges | Slovak Republic, Slovenia |
| n/a | Malta, Romania |
| / | Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.