| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 126 - 131 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025028 | |
| Published online | 15 June 2026 | |
Article
Estimation of entrance surface dose for radiography examinations in Arrazi Hospital from Mohammed VI University Hospital Center of Marrakech (Morocco)
1
Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Technics, Marrakech, Morocco
2
Environmental, Ecological and Agro-Industrial Engineering Laboratory, University Sultan Moulay Sliman, Béni Mellal, Morocco
3
Sultan Moulay Sliman University (LICPM), Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Department of Physics, B.P.523, 23000 Béni Mellal, Morocco
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
21
December
2024
Accepted:
24
May
2025
Abstract
Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are an important tool for radiography and radiological science practice optimization. Assessment of entrance surface doses for patients in digital radiography examinations should be made as a means for the optimization of the radiation protection of the patients. This study aims to determine the typical DRLs (TDRL) values based on entrance surface dose (ESD) for routine radiography in Arrazi Hospital at the Mohammed VI University Hospital Centre (ARH Med VI UHC) in Marrakech, Morocco. A total of 1170 radiography examinations (RE) were included. They underwent 13 separate projections in the adult radiology department of the Marrakech-Safi region teaching hospital. The X-ray tube’s dose area product (DAP) was used to figure out the patient’s entrance surface dose for the cervical spine anterior-posterior (AP), cervical spine lateral (LAT), lumbar spine AP/LAT, abdomen AP, pelvis AP, shoulder AP, knee AP/ LAT, skull AP/ LAT, and the chest PA. The TDRL values of ESD for cervical spine AP/LAT, lumbar spine AP/LAT, abdomen AP, pelvis AP, shoulder AP, knee AP/LAT, skull AP/LAT, and chest AP were 1.52 mGy/1.46 mGy, 3.34 mGy/4.76 mGy, 1.56 mGy, 1.98 mGy, 1.25 mGy, 0.58 mGy/0.58 mGy, 2.2 mGy/2.1 mGy, and 0.22 mGy, respectively. We compared our TDRL values with those of other countries. Although the estimated TDRLs are encouraging, significant efforts are needed to reduce them, particularly for shoulder, knee, and skull X-rays.
Key words: Conventional radiology / dose / radiation protection / DAP / ESD / DRL / TDRL
© H. Khajmi et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
