Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 105 - 112 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025026 | |
| Published online | 15 juin 2026 | |
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 2011. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. AAPM Report No. 204. AAPM. [Google Scholar]
- Bazoma J. 2022. Assessment of organ and effective doses received by adult patients undergoing computed tomography in three hospitals in Brazzaville, Congo Republic. Radiol Phys Technol 15 (4): 379–386. [Google Scholar]
- Boone JM. 2012. Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure − proceedings and recommendations of the radiation dose summit, sponsored by NIBIB, February 24-25, 2011. Radiology 265: 544–554. [Google Scholar]
- Dallou GB. 2024. Establishment of typical dose reference level (DRL) values for adult patients undergoing computed tomography in three hospitals in Brazzaville, Congo Republic. J Multidiscip Appl Nat Sci 4 (2): 262–272. [Google Scholar]
- El Fahssi M. 2024. Patient radiation doses from adult CT examinations at the Souss Massa Regional Hospital. Radioprotection 59 (1): 13–18. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Etim Ekpo MA. 2018. Patient dose estimation using CT-expo software at two hospitals in north-central Nigeria. South Clin Ist Euras 29 (2): 125–31. [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y. 2020. Patient-specific organ and effective dose estimates in adult oncologic CT. AJR 214: 738–46. [Google Scholar]
- Gillet P. 2018. Validation d’un Dosimètre Patient Temps Réel Basé sur Fibre Optique pour la Tomodensitométrie X à l’aide de Simulations Monte Carlo. Thèse de Doctorat/PhD, Université de Strasbourg. [Google Scholar]
- Hakme M. 2023. Proposed national diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography examinations based on clinical indication, patient gender and size and the use of contrast in Lebanon. Radioprotection 58 (2): 113–121. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hussain S. 2022. Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the medical field: a review. Biomed Res Int 2022: 5164970. [Google Scholar]
- International Atomic Energy Agency. 2013. Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology for Paediatric Patients. IAEA Human Health Series No. 24. IAEA. [Google Scholar]
- International Atomic Energy Agency. 2018. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation. IAEA Safety Standards. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-46. IAEA. [Google Scholar]
- International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. 2017. Annals of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 135. ICRP. [Google Scholar]
- International Commission on Radiological Protection. 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. ICRP. [Google Scholar]
- Kabeer SM. 2024. Establishment of diagnostic reference level for routine CT scan examination in Sokoto state, Nigeria. Radioprotetion 59 (3): 197–202. [Google Scholar]
- Khoramian D. 2017. Effective and organ doses from common CT examinations in one general hospital in Tehran, Iran. PJMPE 23 (3): 73–79. [Google Scholar]
- Lee C. 2015. NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for the pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot 35: 891–909. [Google Scholar]
- Sahbaee P. 2014. Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories. Med Phys 41: 072104. [Google Scholar]
- Sindi R, Al-Shamrani B, Bana A, et al. 2024. Impact of implementing national diagnostic reference levels on radiation dose optimization in adult chest CT scans: a comparative analysis. Radioprotection 59 (2): 111–116. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.