Open Access
Numéro
Radioprotection
Volume 55, Numéro 4, October-December 2020
Page(s) 309 - 315
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020081
Publié en ligne 20 janvier 2021
  • Ando R. 2018. Trust – What connects science to daily life. Health Phys. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP0000000000000945. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chiba E, Matsuno K. 2012. Iitate-mura wa makenai: tsuchi to hito no mirai no tame ni (Iitate village will not give up: For the future of humanity and the native soil). Iwanami book. [Google Scholar]
  • Chavis DM, Pretty GM. 1999. Sense of community: Advances in measurement and application. J. Commun. Psychol. 27(6): 635–642. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crouail P, Schneider T, Gariel JC, Masaharu T, Naito W, Orita M, Takamura N. 2020. Analysis of the modalities of return of populations to the contaminated territories following the accident at the Fukushima power plant. Radioprotection 55(2): 79–93. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Figueroa PM. 2013. Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an anthropological approach. Asia Eur. J. 11(1): 53–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gill T. 2014. Radiation and responsibility: What is the right thing for an anthropologist to do in Fukushima? (Practicing a Public Anthropology of the East Japan Disaster). Jpn. Rev. Cult. Anthropol. 15: 151–163. https://doi.org/10.14890/jrca.15.0_151. [Google Scholar]
  • Geysmans R et al. 2020. Broadening and strengthening stakeholder engagement in emergency preparedness, response and recovery. Radioprotection 55(HS2): S219–S225. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Goto A, Rudd RE, Lai AY, Yoshida K, Suzuki Y, Halstead DD, Yoshida-Komiya H, Reich MR. 2014. Leveraging public health nurses for disaster risk communication in Fukushima City: A qualitative analysis of nurses’ written records of parenting counseling and peer discussions. BMC Health Serv. Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-129. [Google Scholar]
  • Inkeles A. 1975. Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries. Ethos. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1975.3.2.02a00160. [Google Scholar]
  • Jorgensen TJ. 2016. Strange Glow: The Story of Radiation. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuroda Y. 2017a. Public health activities contributing to recovery of life after nuclear emergency: Lessons from working with Iitate people. J. Public Health Pract. 81(4): 328–334. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuroda Y. 2017b. The current state and problems of radiation risk communication: based on the results of a 2012 whole village survey. PLoS Curr. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.84670981063d27f0a7c41b959fca70ec. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuroda Y, Iwasa H, Goto A, Yoshida K, Matsuda K, Iwamitsu Y, Yasumura S. 2017. Occurrence of depressive tendency and associated social factors among elderly persons forced by the Great East Japan Earthquake and nuclear disaster to live as long-term evacuees: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014339. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kuroda Y., Iwasa H, Orui M, Moriyama N, Suemoto CK, Yashiro C, Matsuda K, Yasumura S. 2018. Risk factor for incident functional disability and the effect of a preventive exercise program: A 4-year prospective cohort study of older survivors from the great east Japan earthquake and nuclear disaster. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071430. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuroda Y, Koyama Y, Noriko S. 2019. Farming as a purpose of life as well as a business: Rethinking the reconstruction of food and agriculture in Fukushima after the nuclear accident. IAEA Consult. Meet. [Google Scholar]
  • Kusumi T, Hirayama R, Kashima Y. 2017. Risk perception and risk talk: The case of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear radiation risk. Risk Anal. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12784. [Google Scholar]
  • Lochard J, Ando R, Takagi H, Endo S, Momma M, Miyazaki M, Kuroda Y. 2020. The post-nuclear accident co-expertise experience of the Suetsugi community in Fukushima Prefecture, vol. 55(3), pp. 225–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Morioka R. 2014. Gender difference in the health risk perception of radiation from Fukushima in Japan: The role of hegemonic masculinity. Soc. Sci. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sakaino K, Matsuno K, Chiba E. 2011. Challenge of Small Local Government: Community Development in Iitate Village. Hassaku-sha. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider T et al. 2019. The role of radiological protection experts in stakeholder involvement in the recovery phase of post-nuclear accident situations: Some lessons from the Fukushima-Daïchi NPP accident. Radioprotection. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2019038. [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 2017. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2016 Report. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.