Accès gratuit
Numéro
Radioprotection
Volume 54, Numéro 4, October-December 2019
Page(s) 295 - 301
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2019028
Publié en ligne 13 septembre 2019
  • American Society of Radiologic Technologists. 2017. ASRT Position Statements. Available from https://www.asrt.org/docs/default-source/governance/hodpositionstatements.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Avolio BJ, Bass BM. 1995. Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadersh. Q. 6(2): 199–218. [Google Scholar]
  • Avolio BJ, Bass BM. 2004. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Sampler Set. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar]
  • Berrington de González A, Darby S. 2004. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363(9406): 345–351. [Google Scholar]
  • Bontrager KL, Lampignano JP. 2014. Bontrager’s Handbook of Radiographic Positioning and Techniques. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Calman N, Kitson K, Hauser D. 2007. Using information technology to improve health quality and safety in community health centers. Progr. Community Health Partnersh. 1(1): 83–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang I, Hwang H, Hung W, Li Y. 2007. Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 33(2): 296–303. [Google Scholar]
  • Chau PYK, Hu PJ. 2001. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decis. Sci. 32(4): 699–719. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciraj-Bjelac O, et al. 2011. Radiation protection of patients in diagnostic radiology: Status of practice in five Eastern-Europe countries, based on IAEA project. Eur. J. Radiol. 79: 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Deprez T, Schrijver L, Pauwels H, Bosmans H, Marchal G. 2001. Can patient positioning using an ultrashort fluoroscopic pulse be justified? In: IAEA, Radiological Protection of Patients in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy, Vienna, Austria, March 26–30, 2001, pp. 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Dierckx D, Constales K, Gerardy N, Goegebuer T, Persyn K. 2005. Patient dosimetry measurement in 50 radiology departments in Belgium. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 117: 135–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gabel S. 2012. Power, leadership and transformation: The doctor’s potential for influence. Med. Educ. 46: 1152–1160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Germonpré S, Gemmel P, Beeckman D, Trybou J. 2016. Determinants of using (non-)fluoroscopy-guided positioning for radiographs: A case study research. J. Radiol. Prot. 36(3): 667–679. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes K, Curtis T. 2009. Fluoroscopic vs. Blind positioning: Comparing entrance skin exposure. Radiol. Technol. 81(1): 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • International Atomic Energy Agency. 2015. Radiation protection in medicine. Setting the scene of the next decade . In: Proceedings of an International Conference, Bonn, 3–7 December 2012, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Available from http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1663_web.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang HJ, Lockee C, Bass K, Fraser I. 2008. Board engagement in quality: Findings of a survey of hospital and system leaders. J. Healthc. Manag. 53(2): 121–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM. 2009. Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand’s community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(6): 404–416. [Google Scholar]
  • Kroch E, et al. 2006. Hospital boards and quality dashboards. J. Patient Saf. 2(1): 10–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu L, Cruz AM, Rincon AR, Buttar V, Ranson Q, Goertzen D. 2014. What factor determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – A study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disabil. Rehabil. 37(5): 447–455. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • Pynoo B, Devolder P, Duyck W, van Braak J, Sijnave B, Duyck P. 2012. Do hospital physicians’ attitude change during PACS implementation? A cross-sectional acceptance study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 81: 88–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Saunders M, Budden A, MacIver F, Teunis M, Warrenforward H. 2005. Dose implications of fluoroscopy-guided positioning (FGP) for lumbar spine examinations prior to acquiring plain film radiographs. Br. J. Radiol. 78: 130–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sheppard BH, Harwick J, Warshaw PR. 1988. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendation for modifications and future research. J. Consum. Res. 15: 325–343. [Google Scholar]
  • Statkiewicz-Sherer MA, Visconti PJ, Ritenour ER, Haynes KW. 2014. Radiation Protection in Medical Radiography. Maryland Heights: Mosby, Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3): 425–478. [Google Scholar]
  • Vrijens F, et al. 2012. Performance of the belgian health system. KCE Report 196C, 2012. Available from https://kce.fgov.be/sites/default/files/page_documents/KCE_196C_Health_system_performance_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.