Accès gratuit
Volume 52, Numéro 2, April–June 2017
Page(s) 81 - 86
Publié en ligne 27 février 2017
  • AAPM. 2011. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park, Md: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 14: 14–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Balonov M, Shrimpton P. 2012. Effective dose and risks from medical X-ray procedures. Ann. ICRP 41(3): 129–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner DJ. 2008. Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br. J. Radiol. 81: 521–523. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. 2007. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat. Res. 167(4): 396–416. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen W, Kolditz D, Beister M, Bohle R, Kalender WA. 2012. Fast on-site Monte Carlo tool for dose calculations in CT applications. Med. Phys. 39(6): 2985–2996. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Costantino MM, Randall G, Gosselin M, Brandt M, Spinning K, Vegas CD. 2008. CT angiography in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolus. Am. J. Roentgenol. 191(2): 471–474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cristy M, Eckerman K. 1987. Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. ORNL/TM-8381. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  • Deak P, Van Straten M, Shrimpton PC, Zankl M, Kalender WA. 2008. Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography. Eur. Radiol. 18(4): 759–772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Diederich S. 2003. Radiation dose in helical CT for detection of pulmonary embolism. Eur. Radiol. 13(7): 1491–1493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Einstein AJ, Sanz J, Dellegrottaglie S, et al. 2008. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 15(2): 232–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • European Union, European Commission, Directorate-General XII-Science, R. and Development. 1996. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [Google Scholar]
  • Fedullo PF, Tapson VF. 2003. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 349(13): 1247–1256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • He J, Wang F, Dai HJ, et al. 2012. Chinese multi-center study of lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imag. 28(7): 1799–1805. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V. 2007. Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100-or 120-kvp protocol: prospective randomized study. Radiology 245(2): 577–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W, He W. 2012. Estimating cancer risks to adults undergoing body CT examinations. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 150(2): 168–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2012. Quality assurance programme for computed tomography: Diagnostic and therapy applications. Vienna: Human Health Series No. 19. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 34. 1982. Protection of the Patient in Diagnostic Radiology. Ann. ICRP 9: 2–3. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 60. 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Annals of the ICRP, Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 73. 1996. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Ann. ICRP 26: 2–3. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 26. 1977. 1977 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 1: 3. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 103. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann. ICRP 37: 1–332. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 110. 2009. Adult reference computational phantoms. Ann. ICRP 39: 1–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones JG, Mills CN, Mogensen MA, Lee CI. 2012. Radiation dose from medical imaging: a primer for emergency physicians. West J. Emerg. Med. 13(2): 202–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M. 1999. A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur. Radiol. 9(3): 555–562. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li X, Samei E, Segars WP, Sturgeon GM, Colsher JG, Frush DP. 2011. Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk for pediatric chest CT. Radiology 259(3): 862–874. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin CJ. 2007. Effective dose: How should it be applied to medical exposures? Br. J. Radiol. 80(956): 639–647. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin CJ. 2011. Effective dose: practice, purpose and pitfalls for nuclear medicine. J. Radiol. Prot. 31(2): 205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM. 2010. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? Am. J. Roentgenol. 194(4): 890–896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. 2002. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 360(9349): 1914–1920. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NRC 2006. Committee to assess health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, national research council (NRC). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII – Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill JM, Wright L, Murchison JT. 2004. Helical CTPA in the investigation of pulmonary embolism: a 6-year review. Clin. Radiol. 59(9): 819–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill J, Murchison JT, Wright L, Williams J. 2005. Effect of the introduction of helical CT on radiation dose in the investigation of pulmonary embolism. Br. J. Radiol. 78: 46–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pierce DA, Preston DL. 2000. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat. Res. 154(2): 178–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradhan AS, Kim JL, Lee JI. 2012. On the use of “effective dose” (E) in medical exposures. J. Med. Phys. 37(2): 63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. 2007. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat. Res. 168(1): 1–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sahbaee P, Segars WP, Samei E. 2014. Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories. Med. Phys. 41(7): 072104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC. 1981. A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X-ray computed tomography. Med. Phys. 8(4): 488–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Surgeon General 2008. Acting Surgeon General issues call to action to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  • Tapiovaara M, Siiskonen T. 2008. A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examinations, STUK-A231. Helsinki: Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner AC, Zankl M, DeMarco JJ, et al. 2010. The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners. Med. Phys. 37(4): 1816–1825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner AC, Zhang D, Khatonabadi M, et al. 2011. The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams. Med. Phys. 38(2): 820–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vatandoost N, Salehi AR, Kazemi M, et al. 2016. Genetic polymorphism of 8 Y-STR loci in native population of Isfahan province in central part of Iran, Ann. Hum. Biol. 44(2): 175–179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. 2001. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann. Intern. Med. 135(2): 98–107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Woo JK, Chiu RY, Thakur Y, Mayo JR. 2012. Risk-benefit analysis of pulmonary CT angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus. Am. J. Roentgenol. 198(6): 1332–1339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yilmaz Ö, Üstün ED, Kayan M, et al. 2013. Diagnostic quality of CT pulmonary angiography in pulmonary thromboembolism: a comparison of three different kV values. Med. Sci. Monit. 19: 908. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.