Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2026
Page(s) 11 - 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025045
Published online 20 mars 2026

© M.E. Cazado et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2026

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the framework of increasing energy requirements of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the development of innovative nuclear technologies, especially Advanced and Small Modular Reactors (AMRs and SMRs), concerns have been raised in recent scientific and public discussions (Andrade, 2026). Indeed, any nuclear facility must be considered with regard to safety, environmental assessments, and societal acceptance.

It is important to recognize that SMRs design philosophy is focused on enhanced intrinsic safety characteristics and robust engineered safety systems. These includes passive safety mechanisms (Hussein, 2020), such as coolant natural circulation and gravity-driven injection water, that work without external power, and the development of accident-tolerant fuels (ATFs) (Tulkki et al., 2025). These features aim to strengthen radiological protection by improving core damage resistance and mitigating fission product release under normal and hypothetical accident conditions.

In addition, the decentralization model for power generation does not inherently imply a weakening of the radiological risks control: SMRs deployment, as for any other nuclear power facility, remains subject to rigorous national regulations and international safeguards that oversee nuclear material transport and non-proliferation (NEA/OECD, 2021).

Having this in mind, after the technical demonstration of the safety performance of the designs, transparent communication and public engagement are a key aspect to provide sustaining confidence in radiation protection. In Europe, these issues are being systematically studied. As an example, the CATAPULT project, within the EU-funded PIANOFORTE partnership, is devoted to investigate how Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Emergency Preparedness and Response (EP&R) frameworks can be adapted to AMR and SMR technologies, while considering their societal and ethical aspects (CATAPULT, 2025).

In conclusion, while AI-driven increasing energy needs is renewing the interest in nuclear technologies, the radiological protection community (e.g., via CATAPULT) is proactively addressing these challenges to ensure that safety and societal concerns remains central to future nuclear energy developments.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Sara Perez-Martin (INR-KIT) for her valuable insights.

Funding

This work was supported by the CATAPULT project, which has received funding from the PIANOFORTE partnership funded from the European Union’s “EURATOM” research and innovation program under the 101061037 grant agreement.

Illustration

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data Availability

The research data associated with this article are included within the article.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was not required.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies involving human subjects.

References

  • Andrade ER. 2026. The energy requirements of artificial intelligence supplied by innovative types of nuclear power plants may create substantial vulnerabilities in radiation protection for populations. Radioprotection 61 (1): xx–xx. [Google Scholar]
  • CATAPULT. 2025. Comprehensive Assessment and Preparedness for Emerging Nuclear Technologies, https://pianoforte-partnership.eu/catapult/ [Google Scholar]
  • Hussein EMA. 2020 Emerging small modular nuclear power reactors: a critical review. Phys Open 5: 100038. [Google Scholar]
  • NEA/OECD. 2021. Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Opportunities, Nuclear Technology Development and Economics. [Google Scholar]
  • Tulkki V, Sánchez-Espinoza VH, Sobecki N. 2025. Main goals and research outcomes of the EU Projects ELSMOR, McSAFER, and EASI-SMR: regulatory, experimental and analytical safety-related investigations. EPJ Nuclear Sci Technol 11: 33. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Cazado ME, Murat O, Gabrielli F. 2026. Addressing concerns about radiological protection and safety in a context of emerging nuclear technologies. Radioprotection 61(1): 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025045

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.