| Numéro |
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Numéro 4, Octobre-Décembre 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 297 - 305 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025008 | |
| Publié en ligne | 15 décembre 2025 | |
Article
Diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications for paediatric computed tomography examinations at the Mohammed VI University Hospital Center in Marrakech-Morocco
1
Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Technics, Marrakech, Morocco
2
Environmental, Ecological and Agro-Industrial Engineering Laboratory, University Sultan Moulay Sliman, Béni Mellal, Morocco
3
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy- Marrakech, Morocco
4
Radiology Department of the Mother and Child Hospital of the Med VI UHC – Marrakech, Morocco
* Corresponding author: Cette adresse e-mail est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser.
Received:
4
September
2024
Accepted:
7
March
2025
The study aims to derive the diagnostic reference levels for children based on clinical indications (DRL CI) in the computed tomography (CT) unit of the mother and child hospital (MCH) at the Mohammed VI University Hospital Centre in Marrakech (Med VI UHC-M). We retrospectively collected dosimetric statistics from 1730 CTs of children across three age groups (1–5 years, 5–10 years, and 10–15 years). Head, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) CTs were the examinations studied. We have established 14 distinct clinical indications. For each indication, DRLs were defined as the median and third quartile values of the dose index CTDIvol and dose-length product DLP distributions. We analysed the calculated dose distributions between indications for each age group, using a non-parametric test to assess differences in DRLs. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.01. We also compared our DRL CI with the published international standards. For head CT, the variability of CTDIvol and DLP was statistically significant between indications (p < 0.01). However, for chest, abdomen-pelvis, and CAP CTs, the difference was significant for CTDIvol (p < 0.01) and not significant for DLP (p > 0.01). DRL CI in terms of CTDIvol are in good agreement with the literature. The DRLs for the head trauma indication were lower than the results from Europe and Africa, but for the other indications, the DRLs CI were higher than the results from Europe and lower than the ones of Africa.
Key words: CT / CTDIvol / DLP / DRL-Clinical indications (CI) / Paediatric
© A. Boulanouar et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.
