Numéro |
Radioprotection
Volume 51, December 2016
Innovative integrated tools and platforms for radiological emergency preparedness and post-accident response in Europe. Key results of the PREPARE European research project
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | S149 - S151 | |
Section | Enhancing of the existing decision support systems with capabilities of importance – Aquatic dispersion and consequence modelling | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2016053 | |
Publié en ligne | 23 décembre 2016 |
Article
A comparison of radionuclide dispersion model performances for the Baltic Sea and Fukushima releases in the Pacific Ocean
1
Dpt Física Aplicada I, ETSIA, Universidad de Sevilla,
Ctra Utrera km 1,
41013
Sevilla, Spain
2
Ukrainian Center of Environmental and Water Projects,
Glushkov av., 42,
Kiev
03187, Ukraine
3
Institute of Mathematical Machine and System Problems,
Glushkov av., 42,
Kiev
03187, Ukraine
4
IRSN,
BP 330,
83507
La Seyne sur Mer, France
5
NRPA,
Grini naeringspark 13,
NO-1332
Osteras, Norway
6
KIOST,
787 Hean-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan-si,
Gyeonggi-do
426-744, Republic of Korea
7
JAEA,
2-4 Shirakata Shirane, Tokai,
Ibaraki
319-1195, Japan
8
IEN,
Rua Hélio de Almeida 75, Ilha do Fundao,
CEP 21941-906
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
9
KAERI,
Daedeok-Daero 989-111, Yuseong-Gu,
Daejeon, Republic of Korea
10
Bundesamt fuer Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie,
Hamburg, Germany
11
IAEA,
4a Quai Antoine 1er,
MC-98000, Monaco
12
STUK,
Laippatie 4,
00880
Helsinki, Finland
13
National Technical University of Athens,
Iroon Polytexneiou 9,
15780
Zografou, Greece
14
NRG,
Utrechtseweg 310,
6800 ES
Arnhem, The Netherlands
State-of-the art dispersion models were applied to simulate 137Cs dispersion from Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster fallout in the Baltic Sea and from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant releases in the Pacific Ocean after the 2011 Tsunami. Models were of different nature, from box to full three-dimensional models, and included water/sediment interactions. Agreement between models was very good in the Baltic. In the case of Fukushima, results from models could be considered to be in acceptable agreement only after a model harmonization process consisting of using exactly the same forcing (water circulation and parameters) in all models.
Key words: Baltic Sea / Chernobyl / Fukushima Daiichi / dispersion model / cesium
© EDP Sciences 2016
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.