Terrestrial invertebrate population studies in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, Ukraine
Radioprotection, 40 (2005) S857-S863
Published online: 2005-06-17
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
469 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18810-7_9
Current ionising radiation doses in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone do not directly impact on soil biological activity
Nicholas A. Beresford, Michael D. Wood, Sergey Gashchak, Catherine L. Barnett and Nathalie A. WallPLOS ONE 17 (2) e0263600 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263600
Ecotoxicological effects of decommissioning offshore petroleum infrastructure: A systematic review
Amy MacIntosh, Katherine Dafforn, Beth Penrose, Anthony Chariton and Tom CresswellCritical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 52 (18) 3283 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1917949
The importance of deriving adequate wildlife benchmark values to optimize radiological protection in various environmental exposure situations
Almudena Real and Jacqueline Garnier-LaplaceJournal of Environmental Radioactivity 211 105902 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.014
Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al
Jim SmithJournal of Environmental Radioactivity 211 105895 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007
Answer to comments made by J. Smith on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al. (2018)
Karine Beaugelin-Seiller and Jacqueline Garnier-LaplaceJournal of Environmental Radioactivity 211 105924 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.02.016
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119629542.refs
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119686736.refs
Elevated radioactive contamination from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in aquatic biota from a river with a lake in its upper reaches
Mayumi Yoshimura and Akio AkamaCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 75 (4) 609 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0333
Ecological effects of exposure to enhanced levels of ionizing radiation
Stanislav A. Geras’kinJournal of Environmental Radioactivity 162-163 347 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.06.012
Radioactively contaminated areas: Bioindicator species and biomarkers of effect in an early warning scheme for a preliminary risk assessment
Joana Lourenço, Sónia Mendo and Ruth PereiraJournal of Hazardous Materials 317 503 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.020
Radioactive contamination of aquatic insects in a stream impacted by the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident
Mayumi Yoshimura and Akio AkamaHydrobiologia 722 (1) 19 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1672-9
Soil nematode assemblages as bioindicators of radiation impact in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
C. Lecomte-Pradines, J.-M. Bonzom, C. Della-Vedova, et al.Science of The Total Environment 490 161 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.115
Radiocesium concentrations in epigeic earthworms at various distances from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant 6 months after the 2011 accident
Motohiro Hasegawa, Masamichi T. Ito, Shinji Kaneko, et al.Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 126 8 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.06.006
Are radiosensitivity data derived from natural field conditions consistent with data from controlled exposures? A case study of Chernobyl wildlife chronically exposed to low dose rates
J. Garnier-Laplace, S. Geras’kin, C. Della-Vedova, et al.Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 121 12 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.01.013
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology
Glen A. BirdEncyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology 5572 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_282
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF 90SR AND 137CS CONCENTRATIONS IN AN ECOSYSTEM OF THE “RED FOREST” AREA IN THE CHERNOBYL EXCLUSION ZONE
Sergey P. Gaschak, Yulia A. Makliuk, Andrey M. Maksimenko, et al.Health Physics 101 (4) 409 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31821d0b81
Environmental Contaminants in Biota
Bradley SampleEnvironmental Contaminants in Biota 703 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1201/b10598-24
Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl 20 years after the accident
Anders Pape Møller and Timothy A. MousseauBiology Letters 5 (3) 356 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0778
Radionuclide Concentrations in Food and the Environment
Kathryn HigleyFood Science and Technology, Radionuclide Concentrations in Food and the Environment 20066576 209 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420019278.ch7