Open Access
Publication ahead of print
Journal
Radioprotection
Section UPDATED RADIOLOGICAL SITUATION
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020018
Published online 29 April 2020
  • Ehrhardt J, Weis A. (Eds.). 2000. RODOS: decision support system for off-site nuclear emergency management in Europe, final report of the RODOS project. Brussels: European Commission. Report EUR 19144, ISBN No. 92-828-9773-7, includes 2 CDs with all the technical details of the RODOS Systems. [Google Scholar]
  • Grant EJ, Brenner A, Sugiyama H, Sakata R, Sadakane A, Utada M, Cahoon EK, Milder CM, Soda M, Cullings HM, Preston DL, Mabuchi K, Ozasa K. 2017. Solid cancer incidence among the life span study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958–2009. Radiat. Res. 187: 513–537. [Google Scholar]
  • Hsu WL, Preston DL, Soda M, Sugiyama H, Funamoto S, Kodama K, Kimura A, Kamada N, Dohy H, Tomonaga M, Iwanaga M, Miyazaki Y, Cullings H, Suyama A, Ozasa K, Shore R, Mabuchi K. 2013. The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950–2001. Radiat. Res. 179: 361–382. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacob P, Kaiser C, Ulanovsky A. 2017. ProZES − a tool for assessment of assigned share of radiation in probability of cancer development. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Report BfS-RESFOR-120/17. Available from http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/handle/urn:nbn:de:0221-2017032014253. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacob P, Kaiser JC, Ulanovsky A. 2014. Ultrasonographic surveys and thyroid cancer in the Fukushima Prefecture. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 53: 291–401 and 403 (erratum). [Google Scholar]
  • Janssens A. 2013. EU basic safety standards and the European response to the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 48: S19–S26. [Google Scholar]
  • Preston DL, Mattsson A, Holmberg E, Shore R, Hildreth NGM, Boice JD. 2002. Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: a pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat. Res. 158: 220–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas D, Darby S, Fagnani F, Hubert P, Vaeth M, Weiss K. 1992. Definition and estimation of lifetime detriment from radiation exposures: principles and methods. Health Phys. 63: 259–272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vaeth M, Pierce DA. 1990. Calculating excess lifetime risk in relative risk models. Environ. Health Prospect. 87: 83–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ulanowski A, Kaiser JC, Schneider U, Walsh L. 2019. On prognostic estimates of radiation risk in medicine and radiation protection. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 58: 305–319. [Google Scholar]
  • Ulanowski A, Eidemüller M, Güthlin D, Kaiser JC, Shemiakina E, Jacob P. 2016. ProZES: a tool for assessment of assigned share of radiation in probability of cancer development (part II). Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Report BfS-RESFOR-116/16. Availiable from http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/handle/urn:nbn:de:0221-2016112214169. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO. 2013. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami based on a preliminary dose estimation. WHO. Available from http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/fukushima_risk_assessment_2013/en. [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh L. 2016. Fukushima health risk assessment: lessons learned. In: EU Scientific Seminar 2014 Fukushima − Lessons learned and issues, Luxembourg, 18 November 2014, European Commission publication. [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh L, Zhang W, Shore RE, Auvinen A, Laurier D, Wakeford R, Jacob P, Gent N, Anspaugh LR, Schüz J, Kesminiene A, van Deventer E, Tritscher A, del Rosario Pérez M. 2014. A framework for estimating radiation-related cancer risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. Radiat. Res. 182: 556–572. [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh L, Ulanowski A, Kaiser JC, Woda C, Raskob W. 2019. Risk bases can complement dose bases for implementing and optimizing a radiological protection strategy in urgent and transition emergency phases. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 58: 539–552. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.