Free Access
Volume 59, Number 1, January - March
Page(s) 13 - 18
Published online 15 March 2024
  • Abdulhamid M, Ibrahim U, Dlama Zira J, Samson DY, Abdulhamid A. 2022. Assessment of head CT protocol to reduce the radiation dose in eye lens in some selected hospital in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Appl Radiat Isot 190,110469: 350–361. [Google Scholar]
  • AIEA. 2018. Radiation protection of the public and the environment, general safety guide. IAEA safety standards series No. GSG-8 VIENNA, p. 6. [Google Scholar]
  • Albahiti SK, Barnawi RA, Alsafi K, Khafaji M, Aljondi R, Alghamdi SS, Awan Z, Sulieman A, Jafer M, Tamam N, Tajaldeen A, Mattar EH, Al-Malki KM, Bradley D. 2022. Establishment of institutional diagnostic reference levels for 6 adult computed tomography examinations: Results from preliminary data collection. Radiat Phys Chm 2012, 110477: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • Amaoui B, Semghouli S, Massaq M, Aabid M, Hakam OK, Choukri A, El Kharras A. 2019. Radiation doses from computed tomography practice in Regional Hospital Center Hassan II of Agadir, Morocco. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 10 (10): 629–632. [Google Scholar]
  • Arlany L, Toh HG, Nazir B, Ng JJ, Tay YH, Tay YS, Poon CJX, Lee LN, Fum WKS, Lee EYT, Mariah SI, Fortier MV, Tham WP, Chew LL, Chong KHE, Chong LR. 2023. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for a Singapore healthcare cluster. Radiography 29 (1): 184–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benamar M, Housni A, Sadiki S, Amazian K, Essahlaoui A, Labzour A. 2023. Patient dose assessment in computed tomography in a Moroccan imaging department. Radioprotection 58 (1): 49–53. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Chan VO, McDermott S, Buckley O, Allen S, Casey M, O’Laoide R, Torreggiani WC. 2012. The relationship of body mass index and abdominal fat on the radiation dose received during routine computed tomographic imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. Can Assoc Radiol J 63 (4): 260–266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Delchambre M. 2012. Calcul de la dose efficace cumulée reçue par nos patients en tomodensitométrie diagnostique. Création d’un outil informatique pour le médecin généraliste. Médecine humaine et pathologie. 10–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Dimitroukas P, Metaxas I, Efthymiou O, Kalogeropoulou P, Zampakis E, Panayiotakis S. 2022. Patient dose audit in common CT examinations. Radiat Phys Chem 192: 3. [Google Scholar]
  • El Fahssi M, Semghouli S, Amaoui B, Jroundi L, Çaoui M. 2023. Assessment of entrance skin dose for adult patients undergoing diagnostic X-ray examinations in the Souss-Massa region of Morocco. Radioprotection 58 (2): 107–112. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • El Mansouri M, Talbi M, Choukri A, Nhila O, Aabid M. 2022. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for adult computed tomography in Morocco. Radioprotection 57 1: 61–66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hasan N, Rizk C, Babikir E. 2022. National diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications and patient size for adults’ computed tomography in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Radiat Phys Chem 197,110147: 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37: 2–4. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP 46 (1): 9. [Google Scholar]
  • IRSN. 2023. Analyse des données relatives à la mise à jour des niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire − IRSN, septième bilan, p. 39. [Google Scholar]
  • Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. 2017. U. S. Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284 (1): 120–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kayun Z, Abdul Karim MK, Harun HH, Shaari A, Mahmud R, Abdul Hamid H, Sabarudin A, Tsuey Chew M. 2021. Radiation doses and size-specific dose estimate from CT brain examinations according to head sizes in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Radiat Phys Chem 189,109694: 1–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC, Wall BF. 2002. Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75 (898): 819–830. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin EC. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Dec;85(12):1142-6; quiz 1146. [Google Scholar]
  • Mrabit K. 2022. Building the nuclear and radiological safety and security authority in the Kingdom of Morocco: sharing experience and lessons learned. In: Nuclear law: the global debate. pp. 319–333. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel HD. 2007. CT Parameters that influence the radiation dose. In: radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Medical radiology (D. Tack, P.A. Gevenois, Eds.). pp. 51–79. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • NCRP. 2009. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, Report No. 160. NCRP, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • Paulo G, Damilakis J, Tsapaki V, Schegerer AA, Repussard J, Jaschke W, Frija G. 2020. European society of radiology. Diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review. Insights Imaging 17;11(1): 96. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rajiah P, Guild J, Browning T, Venkataraman V, Abbara S. 2020. A comprehensive CT radiation dose reduction and protocol standardization program in a complex, tertiary hospital system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 49 (5): 340–346. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson DB, Leuraud K, Laurier D, Gillies M, Haylock R, Kelly-Reif K, et al. 2023. Cancer mortality after low dose exposure to ionising radiation in workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS): cohort study. BMJ 382: e074520 2022-074520 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schöckel L, Jost G, Seidensticker P, Lengsfeld P, Palkowitsch P, Pietsch H. 2020. Developments in X-Ray contrast media and the potential impact on computed tomography. Investig Radiol 55 (9): 592–597. [Google Scholar]
  • Sebelego I, Acho S, van der Merwe B, Rae WID. 2023. Size based dependence of patient dose metrics, and image quality metrics for clinical indicator-based imaging protocols in abdominal CT procedures. Radiography 29 (6): 961–974. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Semghouli S, Aabid M, Amaoui B, Choukri A, El Kharras A. 2022a. Establishment of diagnostic reference level for computed tomography of head pediatrics in Morocco: a pilot study. Mater Today: Proc 52(Part 1): 85–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Semghouli S, Amaoui B, Wakrim S. 2022b. Radiation doses during computed tomography scan imaging in Hassan II Hospital, Agadir, Morocco. Pan Afr Med J 41 (290): 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Steiniger B, Klippel C, Teichgräber U, Reichenbach JR, Fiebich M. 2022. Can the size-specific dose estimate be derived from the body mass index? A feasibility study. Radiat Prot Dosim 198 (6): 325–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorsten MB. 2008. Computed Tomography from Photon Statistics to Modern Cone-Beam CT, Library of Congress Control Number: 2007943070. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. p. 1. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.