Free Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 58, Number 3, July - September 2023
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 161 - 167 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023021 | |
| Published online | 14 September 2023 | |
- Ando R, Koyama R, Schneider T, Lecomte J-F, Isse M, Koyama Y. 2023. Report on the 23rd Fukushima Dialogue “Thinking together about issues of Fukushima Daiichi treated water”. Radioprotection 58(1): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Brédif H, de Montbel A. 2019. Facilitations stratégiques. Refonder l’action en commun dans les organisations et les territoires. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. (in French) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dubreuil GH, Lochard J, Girard P, Guyonnet JF, Le Cardinal G, Lepicard S, Livolsi P, Monroy M, Ollagnon H, Pena-Vega A, Pupin V, Rigby J, Rolevitch I, Schneider T. 1999. Chernobyl post-accident management: The ETHOS project. Health Physics 77(4): 361–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukushima Prefecture. 2022. Steps for reconstruction and revitalization in Fukushima Prefecture. https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/558060.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP Publication 146. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: Update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. Ann. ICRP 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645320952659. [Google Scholar]
- Lochard J, Schneider T, Ando R, Niwa O, Clement C, Lecomte JF, Tada JI. 2019. An overview of the dialogue meetings initiated by ICRP in Japan after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 54(2): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2019021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- NPO Fukushima Dialogue. 2023. https://fukushima-dialogue.jp/en/ (accessed 29/07/2023). [Google Scholar]
- Thu Zar W, Lochard J, Taira Y, Takamura N, Orita M, Matsunaga H. 2022. Risk communication in the recovery phase after a nuclear accident: The contribution of the “co-expertise process”. Radioprotection 57(4): 281–288. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Trafimchik Z. 2005. The CORE Programme in Belarus: A new approach to the rehabilitation of living conditions in contaminated areas. Vienna: Chernobyl Forum. [Google Scholar]
- Yasutaka T, Kanai Y, Kurihara M, Kobayashi T, Kondoh A, Takahashi T, Kuroda Y. 2020. Dialogue, radiation measurements and other collaborative practices by experts and residents in the former evacuation areas of Fukushima: A case study in Yamakiya District, Kawamata Town. Radioprotection 55(3): 215–224. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.