Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 56, Number 4, October - December 2021
Page(s) 275 - 285
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021030
Published online 01 November 2021
  • Bayart E, Azria D, Balosso J, Benderitter M, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E, Delpon G, Deutsch E, Dutreix M, Lacornerie T, Romeo PH, Marchesi V, Maingon P. 2019. RadioTransNet : le réseau national de radiothérapie oncologique préclinique. Cancer Radiother. 23(6-7): 609–616. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernier M-O, Baysson H, Pearce MS, Moissonnier M, Cardis E, Hauptmann M, Struelens L, Dabin J, Johansen C, Journy N, Laurier D, Blettner M, Le Cornet L, Pokora R, Gradowska P, Meulepas JM, Kjaerheim K, Istad T, Olerud H, Sovik A. 2018. Cohort Profile: The EPI-CT study: a European pooled epidemiological study to quantify the risk of radiation-induced cancer from paediatric CT. Int. J. Epidemiol. 48(2): 379–381. [Google Scholar]
  • Borras JM, Lievens Y, Barton M, Corral J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Grau C. 2016. How many new cancer patients in Europe will require radiotherapy by 2025? An ESTRO-HERO analysis. Radiother. Oncol. 119(1): 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS – Dose Datamed 2). [online] Federal Office for Radiation Protection. Available from https://www.bfs.de/EN/bfs/we/international/dose-datamed-2.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Euratom. 2013. European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Document 02013L0059-20140117 [online] Available from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/2014-01-17 [Accessed 24 Feb. 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  • European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM); European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics (EFOMP); European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS); European Society of Radiology (ESR); European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO). 2017. Common strategic research agenda for radiation protection in medicine. Insights Imaging 8(2): 183–197. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission (EC – Eurostat). Healthcare Resource Statistics – Technical Resources and Medical Technology – Statistics Explained. [online] ec.europa.eu. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Healthcare_resource_statistics_-_technical_resources_and_medical_technology. ISSN 2443-8219. [Google Scholar]
  • European Union. 2018. Radiation Protection No185. European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging. [online] Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available from http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/rp_185.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Francolini G, Desideri I, Stocchi G, Salvestrini V, Ciccone LP, Garlatti P, Loi M, Livi L. 2020. Artificial Intelligence in radiotherapy: state of the art and future directions. Med. Oncol. 37(6). [Google Scholar]
  • Gifi A. 1990. Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chichester, New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoeschen C. 2018. EURAMED’s vision on medical radiation protection (research). Ann. ICRP 47(3-4): 152–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. 2018. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18(8): 500–510. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6268174/. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 135. 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann. ICRP 46(1). [Google Scholar]
  • International Atomic Energy Agency. 2014. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. GSR Part 3. Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • International Atomic Energy Agency. 2018. Radiation protection and safety in medical uses of ionizing radiation: Specific safety guide. Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • Kaufman L, Rousueeuw PJ. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Masjedi H, Zare MH, Keshavarz Siahpoush N, Razavi-Ratki SK, Alavi F, Shabani M. 2019. European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose. La radiologia medica 125(3): 296–305. [Google Scholar]
  • Meskens G. 2020 Ethical considerations on stakeholder engagement in radiological risk governance. Radioprotection 55(HS2): S259–S262. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenblatt E, Izewska J, Anacak Y, Pynda Y, Scalliet P, Boniol M, Autier P. 2013. Radiotherapy capacity in European countries: An analysis of the Directory of Radiotherapy Centres (DIRAC) database. Lancet Oncol. 14(2): e79–e86. [Google Scholar]
  • Skinner R, Wallace WHB, Levitt GA. 2006. Long-term follow-up of people who have survived cancer during childhood. Lancet Oncol. 7(6): 489–498. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsapaki V. 2020. Radiation dose optimization in diagnostic and interventional radiology: Current issues and future perspectives. Phys. Med. 79(79): 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Turcanu C, Van Oudheusden M, Abelshausen B, Schieber C, Schneider T, Zeleznik N, Geysmans R, Duranova T, Perko T, Pölzl-Viol C. 2020. Stakeholder engagement in radiological protection: Developing theory, practice and guidelines. Radioprotection 55(HS2): S211–S218. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.