Free Access
Volume 53, Number 2, April-June 2018
Page(s) 107 - 113
Published online 12 April 2018
  • Alessio AM, Kinahan PE. 2012. CT protocol selection in PET-CT imaging – image wisely. Virginia (United States): American College of Radiology. [Google Scholar]
  • Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, Cheng PM, Vesselle H, Karp JS. 2004. PET/CT scanner instrumentation, challenges, and solutions. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 42: 1017–1032. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brahme A. 2014. In: Comprehensive biomedical physics, Vol. 1, pp. 28–29. USA: Elsevier B.V. [Google Scholar]
  • Brix G, Lechel U, Glatting G, Ziegler SI, Munzing W, Muller SP, Beyer T. 2005. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole body dual modality examinations. J. Nucl. Med. 46: 608–613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Churchyard GJ, Mametja LD, Mvusi L, Ndjeka N, Hesseling AC, Reid A, Babatunde S, Pillay Y. 2014. Tuberculosis control in South Africa: Successes, challenges, and recommendations. South Afr. Med. J. 104: 244–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coursey CA, Frush DP. 2008. CT and radiation: What radiologists should know. Appl. Radiol. 37(3): 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Euclid Seeram. 2009. Computed tomography physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control. 3rd edition. USA: Saunders. [Google Scholar]
  • Goo JM, Im JG, Do KH, Yeo JS, Seo JB, Kim HY, Chung JK. 2000. Pulmonary tuberculoma evaluated by means of FDG PET: findings in 10 cases. Radiology 216: 117–121. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahm CR, Park HY, Jeon K, Um SW, Suh GY, Chung MP, Kim H, Kwon OJ, Koh WJ. 2010. Solitary pulmonary nodules caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex. Lung 188: 25–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hays MT, Watson EE, Thomas SR, Stabin M. 2002. MIRD dose estimate report No. 19: Radiation absorbed dose estimates from 18F-FDG. J. Nucl. Med. 43: 210–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang B, Law MW, Khong PL. 2009. Whole-body PETCT scanning: Estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 251: 166–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2013. Radiation protection of patients (RPOP). Accessed 11 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 103. 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 37: 2–4. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 106. 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. Ann. ICRP 38: 1–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Tanaka Y, Miyatake H, Hata H, Hara T. 2015. Methods of CT dose estimation in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 56: 695–700. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S. 2004. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230: 619–628. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Karam M, Roberts-Klein S, Shet N, Chang J, Feustel P. 2008. Bilateral hilar foci on 18F-FDG PET scan in patients without lung cancer: variables associated with benign and malignant etiology. J. Nucl. Med. 49: 1429–1436. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaushik A, Jaimini A, Tripathi M, D’Souza M, Sharma R, Mishra AK, Mondal A, Dwarakanath BS. 2013. Estimation of patient dose in 18F-FDG and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 9: 477–483. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khamwan K, Krisanachinda A, Pasawang P. 2010. The determination of patient dose from 18F-FDG PET/CT examination. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 141(1): 50–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim IJ, Lee JS, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Jeong YJ, Jun S, Nam HY, Kim JS. 2008. Double-phase 18F-FDG PET-CT for determination of pulmonary tuberculoma activity. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 35: 808–814. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kramer R, Zankl M, Williams G, Drexler G. 1982. The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods Part I. GSF-Report S-885. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar S, Pandey AK, Sharma P, Malhotra A, Kumar R. 2012. Optimization of the CT acquisition protocol to reduce patient dose without compromising the diagnostic quality for PET-CT: a phantom study. Nucl. Med. Commun. 33: 164–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lechel U, Becker G, Langenfeld-Jäger G, Brix G. 2009. Dose reduction by automatic exposure control in multi-detector computed tomography: comparison between measurement and calculation. Eur. Radiol. 19: 1027–1034. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li X et al. 2011. Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II Application to patients. Med. Phys. 38: 408–420. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu D, Khong LP, Gao Y, Mahmood U, Quinn B, St.Germain J, Xu XG, Dauer LT. 2016. Radiation dosimetry of whole-body dual-tracer 18F-FDG and 11C-acetate PET/CT for hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Nucl. Med. 57: 907–912. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu F, Wang G, Cong W, Hsieh SS, Pelc NJ. 2013. Dynamic bowtie for fan-beam CT. J. X-ray Sci. Technol. 21(4): 579–590. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahmud MH, Nordin AJ, Ahmad Saad FF, Fattah Azman AZ. 2014. Estimation of patient radiation dose from whole body 18FFDG PET/CT examination in cancer imaging: a preliminary study. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 546: 012008. [Google Scholar]
  • Mattsson S, Söderberg M. 2011. Radiation dose management in CT, SPECT/CT and PET/CT techniques. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 147(1–2): 13–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollough CH, Schueler BA. 2000. Calculation of effective dose. Med. Phys. 27: 828–837. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. 2008. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248: 254–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moran JK, Lee HB, Blaufox MD. 1999. Optimization of urinary FDG excretion during PET imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 40: 1352–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Quinn B, Dauer Z, Pandit-Taskar N, Schoder H, Dauer LT. 2016. Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates. BMC Med. Imaging 16: 41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reiser MF, Hricak H, Knauth M. 2012. In: Radiation dose from Multidetector CT. 2nd edition, pp. 565–566. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Sathekge MM, Vorster M, Stoltz A, Jacobs AG. 2014. Imaging of pulmonary tuberculosis with 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose and 18F- Ethylcholine. Open Nucl. Med. J. 6: 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Skoura E, Zumla A, Bomanji J. 2015. Imaging in tuberculosis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 32: 87–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soussan M, Brillet PY, Mekinian A, Khafagy A, Nicolas P, Vessieres A, Brauner M. 2012. Patterns of pulmonary tuberculosis on FDG-PET/CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 81: 2872–2876. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vandevoorde C. 2011. CT protocols and CT dose contribution in PET/CT. Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  • Wall BF. 1996. How to assess the dose to the patient in diagnostic radiology. Chilton, Didcot (UK): National Radiation Protection Board NRPB. [Google Scholar]
  • World Health Organization. 2016. Global Tuberculosis Report. Accessed 06 April 2017. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.