Nouvelle méthode de surveillance des travailleuses du nucléaire par anthroporadiamétrie : utilisation des calculs Monte Carlo associés aux fantômes déformables de type Mesh et NURBS

Free Access

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 46, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2011


Page(s)		209 - 233
Section		Articles
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2011105
Published online		19 May 2011

Agostinelli S., Allison J., Amako K., Apostolakis J., Araujo H., Arce P., et al. (2003) Geant4: a Simulation Toolkit., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506 (3), 250-303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aubineau-Laniece I., de Carlan L., Clairand I., Lemosquet A., Chiavassa S., Pierrat N., Bardies M., Franck D. (2005) Current developments at IRSN on computational tools dedicated to assessing doses for both internal and external exposure, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 115 (1-4), 522-529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berger C.D., Lane B.H. (1985) Biometric estimate of chest wall thickness of females Health Phys. 49, 419–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Berger M.J., Hubbell J.H., Seltzer S.M., Chang J., Coursey J.S., Sukumar R., Zucker D.S. (2005) XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database National Institute of Standards and Technology (http://physics.nist.gov/xcom). [Google Scholar]
Brown T.P., Ringrose C., Hyland R.E., Cole A.A., Brotherston T.M. (1999). A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application, Br. Jr. Plast. Surg. 52, 355–359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Clairand I., Bouchet L.G., Ricard M., Durigon M., Di Paola M., Aubert B. (2000) Improvement of internal dose calculations using mathematical models of different adult heights, Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (10), 2771-2785. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Comité Européen de Normalisation (2004) Désignation des tailles de vêtements : partie 3 : Mesures et intervalles, EN 13402-3. [Google Scholar]
Fabié A., Delay E., Chavoin J.P., Soulhiard F., Seguin P. (2006) Plastic surgery application in artistic studies of breast cosmetic, Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 51, 142-150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Farah J., Broggio D., Franck D. (2010a) Creation and use of adjustable phantoms: application for the lung monitoring of nuclear workers, Health Phys. 99 (5), 649-661. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Farah J., Broggio D., Franck D. (2010b) Examples of Mesh and NURBS modeling for in vivo lung counting studies, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq313. [Google Scholar]
Farah J., Broggio D., Franck D. (2010c) Female workers and in vivo lung monitoring: a simple model for morphological dependency of counting efficiency curves, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 7377-7395. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Farah J., Henriet J., Broggio D., Laurent R., Fontaine E., Chebel-Morello B., Sauget M., Salomon M., Makovicka L., Franck D. (2010d) Development of a new CBR-Based platform for human contamination emergency situations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., doi:10.1093/rpd/ncq440. [Google Scholar]
Franck D., Borissov N., de Carlan L., Pierrat N., Genicot J.L., Etherington G. (2003), Application of Monte Carlo calculations to calibration of anthropomorphic phantoms used for activity assessment of actinides in lungs, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 105 (1-4), 403-408. [Google Scholar]
Franck D., de Carlan L., Pierrat N., Broggio D., Lamart S. (2007) OEDIPE: a new graphical user interface for fast construction of numerical phantoms and MCNP calculations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 127 (1–4), 262–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Griffith R.V., Dean P.N., Anderson A.L., Fisher J.C. (1978) Fabrication of a tissue-equivalent torso phantom for intercalibration of in-vivo transuranic-nuclide counting facilities, Symp. Adv. Radiat. Prot. Monit. (Stockholm, Sweden). [Google Scholar]
Henriet J., Farah J., Chebel-Morello B., Bopp M., Broggio D., Makovicka L. (2010) Feasibility study of a new platform based on the Case-Based Reasoning principles to efficiently search and store voxel phantoms, Radioprotection 45 (1), 67-82. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
ICRP Publication 110 (2009) Adult Reference Computational Phantoms, Ann. ICRP 39 (2). [Google Scholar]
ICRU Report 44 (1989) Tissues Substitues in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurements. [Google Scholar]
Kovtun A.N., Firsanov V.B., Fominykh V.I. andIsaakyan G.A. (2000) Metrological parameters of the unified calibration whole-body phantom with gamma-emitting radionuclides, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 89 (3-4), 239-242. [Google Scholar]
Kramer R., Zankl M., Williams G., Dexter G. (1982) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part I: the male (Adam) and female (Eva) adult mathematical phantoms, Report GSF-Bericht S-885, München, GSF. [Google Scholar]
Kramer R., Vieira J.W., Khoury H.J., Lima F.R.A., Fülle D. (2003) All About MAX: A Male Adult VoXel phantom for Monte Carlo Calculations in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (9), 1239-1269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
de La Grandmaison G.L., Clairand I., Durigon M. (2001) Organ Weight in 684 adult autopsies: new tables for a caucasoid population, For. Sci. Int. 119, 149-154. [Google Scholar]
Makovicka L., Vasseur A., Sauget M., Martin E., Gschwind R., Henriet J., Salomon M. (2009) Avenir des nouveaux concepts des calculs dosimétriques basés sur les méthodes de Monte Carlo, Radioprotection, 44 (1), 77-88. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Min P. (2004), Binvox 3D Mesh voxelizer. http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~min/binvox/. [Google Scholar]
Newton D., Wells A.C., Mizushita S., Toohey R.E., Sha J.Y., Jones R., Jefferies S.J., Palmer H.E., Rieksts G.A., Anderson A.L., Campbell G.W. (1985). The Livermore phantom as a calibration standard in the assessment of plutonium in lungs. Proceedings of a Symposium, Assessment of Radioactive Contamination in Man, Paris, 19–23 november 1984, organized by IAEA in cooperation with WHO. [Google Scholar]
Nooruddin F., Turk G. (2003) Simplification and Repair of Polygonal Models Using Volumetric Techniques, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 9, 191-205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pechter E.A. (1998) A new method for determining bra size and predicting postaugmentation breast size, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102 (4). [Google Scholar]
Pelowitz D.B. (2008), MCNPX User’s manual version 2.6.0, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report LA-CP-07-1473. [Google Scholar]
Petoussi-Henss N., Zankl M. (1998) Voxel anthropomorphic models as a tool for internal dosimetry, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 79, 415-418. [Google Scholar]
Regnault P., Baker T.J., Gleason M.C., Gordon H.L., Grossman A.R., Lewis J.R., Waters W.R., Williams J.E. (1972) Clinical trial and evaluation of a proposed new inflatable mammary prosthesis, Plast. Reconst. Surg. 50, 220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Salvat F., Fernandez-Varea J.M., Acosta E., Sempau J. (2001) PENELOPE, a Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport, NEA/NSC/DOC(2001)19, ISBN:92-64-18475-9. [Google Scholar]
Segars W.P. (2001), PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. [Google Scholar]
Segars W.P., Tsui B. (2007) 4D MOBY and NCAT phantoms for medical imaging simulation of mice and men, J. Nucl. Med. Meet. Abst. 48 (2), 203P. [Google Scholar]
Sigurdson L.J., Kirkland S.A. (2006). Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements, Plast. Reconst. Surg. 118 (2). [Google Scholar]
Smith D.J., Palin W.E., Katch V.L., Bennett J.E. (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: Normal Values, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 78 (3). [Google Scholar]
Turner A.J., Dujon D.G. (2005) Predicting cup size after reduction mammaplasty, Br. Jr. Plast. Surg. 58, 290-298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Vandeput J.J., Nelissen M. (2002) Considerations on Anthropometric Measurements of the Female Breast, Aesth. Plast. Surg. 26, 348-355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Warren R., Thompson D., del Farte C., Cordell M., Highnam R., Tromans C., Warsi I., Ding J., Sala E., Estrella F., Solomindes A.E., Odeh M., McClatchey R., Bazzocchi M., Amendolia S.R., Brady M. (2007) A comparison of some anthropometric parameters between an italian and a UK population: “proof of principle” of a European project using MammoGrid, Clin. Rad. 62, 1052-1060. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wood K., Cameron M., Fitzgerald K. (2008) Breast size, bra fit and thoracic pain in young women: a correlation study, Chiropr. Osteopat. 16 (1). [Google Scholar]
Xu X.G., Taranenko V., Zhang J., Shi C. (2007) A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods - RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9, Phys. Med. Biol. 52 (23), 7023-7044. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zaidi H., Xu X.G. (2007). Computational anthropomorphic models of the human anatomy: the path to realistic Monte Carlo modelling in radiological sciences, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 471-500. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zankl M., Wittmann A. (2001) The adult male voxel model ‘Golem’ segmented from whole-body CT patient data, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 40, 153-162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zankl M., Petoussi-Henss N., Fill U., Regulla D. (2003) The application of voxel phantoms to the internal dosimetry of radionuclides, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 105, 539-547. [Google Scholar]
Zubal I.G., Harrell C.R., Smith E.O., Rattner Z., Gindi G., Hoffer P.B. (1994) Computerized three dimensional segmented human anatomy, Med. Phys. 21 (2), 299-302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.