Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 140 - 145 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025021 | |
| Published online | 15 June 2026 | |
- Damato A.L, Viswanathan A.N. 2015. Magnetic Resonance–Guided Gynecologic Brachytherapy. MR-Guid. Interv. 23, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2015.05.015 [Google Scholar]
- Garipagaoglu M, Tunçel N, Dalmaz MG, et al. 2006. Changes in applicator positions and dose distribution between high dose rate brachytherapy fractions in cervix carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy. British J Radiol 79 (942): 504–509. [Google Scholar]
- Hellebust TP, Dale E, Skjønsberg A, et al. 2001. Inter fraction variations in rectum and bladder volumes and dose distributions during high dose rate brachytherapy treatment of the uterine cervix investigated by repetitive CT-examinations. Radiotherapy Oncology 60 (3): 273–280. [Google Scholar]
- Hoskin PJ, Cook M, Bouscale D, et al. 1996. Changes in applicator position with fractionated high dose rate gynaecological brachytherapy. Radiotherapy Oncology 40 (1): 59–62. [Google Scholar]
- Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD, Alasti H, Moseley DJ, Sharpe M.B, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray D.A. 2006. Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys 33, 1573–1582. [Google Scholar]
- Jayarathna S, Hoang M, Badkul R, et al. 2023. Dosimetric impact of applicator displacement on three-dimensional image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatments for cervical cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 15 (5): 334–343. [Google Scholar]
- Kim RY, Meyer JT, Plott WE, et al. 1995. Major geometric variations between multiple high-dose-rate applications of brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix: frequency and types of variation. Radiology 195 (2): 419–422. [Google Scholar]
- Pötter R, 2009. Image-guided brachytherapy sets benchmarks in advanced radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 91, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
- Pötter R, Balosso J, Baumann M, et al. 2018. Union of light ion therapy centers in Europe (ULICE EC FP7)–objectives and achievements of joint research activities. Radiother. Oncol. 128, 83–100. [Google Scholar]
- Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, et al. 2004. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys 31 (3): 633–674. [Google Scholar]
- Schindel J, Zhang W, Bhatia SK, et al. 2013. Dosimetric impacts of applicator displacements and applicator reconstruction-uncertainties on 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 5 (4): 250–257. [Google Scholar]
- Viswanathan AN, Thomadsen B, et al. 2012. American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles. Brachytherapy 11 (1): 33–46. [Google Scholar]
- Yong JS, Ung NM, Jamalludin Z, et al. 2016. Dosimetric impact of applicator displacement during high dose rate (HDR) Cobalt-60 brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a planning study. Radiat Phys Chem 119: 264–271. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.