EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 61 / No 2 (Avril-Juin 2026) Radioprotection, 61 2 (2026) 113-120 References
Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2026
Page(s) 113 - 120
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025029
Published online 15 June 2026
  • Aberle C, Ryckx N, Treier R, Schindera S. 2020. Update of national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT in Switzerland and assessment of radiation dose reduction since 2010. Eur Radiol 30 (3): 1690–1700. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ataç GK, Parmaksız A, İnal T, Bulur E, Bulgurlu F, Öncü T, Gündoğdu S. 2015. Patient doses from CT examinations in Turkey. Diagn Interv Radiol 21 (5): 428–434. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Atlı E, Akpınar E, Ünal E, Oğuz Sayan B, Haliloğlu M. 2018. The feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of the pediatric abdomen by dual-source CT. Jpn J Radiol 36 (7): 437–443. [Google Scholar]
  • Benmessaoud M, Housni A, Elmabrouki M, Essasnaoui F, Sadiki N, Dadouch A, Labzour A. 2021. Derivation of local diagnostic reference levels for common adult computed tomography examinations in Moroccan hospital. Radiat Prot Dosim 194 (4): 208–213. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Cho P-K. 2013. The development of a diagnostic reference level on patient dose for head computed tomography angiography examinations in Korea. Radiat Prot Dosim 154 (4): 505–509. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Eller A, Wiesmüller M, Wüst W, Heiss R, Kopp M, Saake M, Brand M, et al. 2019. Carotid CTA at the lowest tube voltage (70 kV) in comparison with automated tube voltage adaption. Am J Neuroradiol 40 (8): 1374–1382. American Journal of Neuroradiology. [Google Scholar]
  • Fanous R, Kashani H, Jimenez L, Murphy G, Paul NS. 2012. Image quality and radiation dose of pulmonary CT angiography performed using 100 and 120 kVp. Am J Roentgenol 199 (5): 990–996. [Google Scholar]
  • Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. 2012. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. British J Radiol 85 (1018): 1390–1397. The British Institute of Radiology. 131–151. Great Titchfield Street, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Foley W, Karcaaltincaba M. 2003. Computed tomography angiography: principles and clinical applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(Suppl 1): S23– S30. [Google Scholar]
  • Gariani J, Martin SP, Botsikas D, Becker CD, Montet X. 2018. Evaluating the effect of increased pitch, iterative reconstruction and dual source CT on dose reduction and image quality. British J Radiol 91 (1088): 20170443. The British Institute of Radiology. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. 2012. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. British J Radiol 85 (1020): e1316–e1317. [Google Scholar]
  • Harun HH, Abdul Karim MK, Abd Rahman MA, Abdul Razak HR, Che Isa IN, Harun F. 2020. Establishment of CTPA local diagnostic reference levels with noise magnitude as a quality indicator in a tertiary care hospital. Diagnostics 10 (9): 680. MDPI. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann Icrp 46 (1): 1–144. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP IC. on R. 2001. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Ann ICRP 31 (4): 33–52. ICRP. [Google Scholar]
  • Ippolito D, Talei Franzesi C, Fior D, Bonaffini PA, Minutolo O, Sironi S. 2015. Low kV settings CT angiography (CTA) with low dose contrast medium volume protocol in the assessment of thoracic and abdominal aorta disease: a feasibility study. British J Radiol 88 (1049): 20140140. The British Institute of Radiology. [Google Scholar]
  • Ismail TF, Cheasty E, King L, Naaseri S, Lazoura O, Gartland N, Padley S, et al. 2017. High-pitch versus conventional cardiovascular CT in patients being assessed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a real-world appraisal. Open Heart 4 (2): e000626. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalender WA. 2014. Dose in x-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 59 (3): R129. IOP Publishing. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim MC, Han DK, Nam YC, Kim YM, Yoon J. 2015. Patient dose for computed tomography examination: dose reference levels and effective doses based on a national survey of 2013 in Korea. Radiat Protect Dosim 164 (3): 383–391. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumamaru KK, Hoppel BE, Mather RT, Rybicki FJ. 2010. CT angiography: current technology and clinical use. Radiol Clinics North Am 48 (2): 213–235. [Google Scholar]
  • MacGregor K, Li I, Dowdell T, Gray BG. 2015. Identifying institutional diagnostic reference levels for CT with radiation dose index monitoring software. Radiology 276 (2): 507–517. [Google Scholar]
  • Matsunaga Y, Chida K, Kondo Y, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi M, Minami K, Suzuki S, et al. 2019. Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for common computed tomography examinations: results from the Japanese nationwide dose survey. British J Radiol 92 (1094): 20180290. The British Institute of Radiology. [Google Scholar]
  • McCollough CH, Bushberg JT, Fletcher JG, Eckel LJ. 2015. Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans. Mayo Clinic Proc 90 (10): 1380–1392. [Google Scholar]
  • McDermott S, Otrakji A, Kalra MK. 2019. Radiation dose optimization in CT. In: Multislice CT (K. Nikolaou, F. Bamberg, A. Laghi, G.D. Rubin Eds.) pp. 35–57. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved August 8, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_148. [Google Scholar]
  • Mohiy HA, Sim J, Seeram E, Annabell N, Geso M, Mandarano G, Davidson R. 2012. A dose comparison survey in CT departments of dedicated paediatric hospitals in Australia and Saudi Arabia. World J Radiol 4 (10): 431–438. [Google Scholar]
  • Nenot J-C., Brenot J, Laurier D, Rannou A, Thierry D. 2009. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Retrieved August 8, 2024, from https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:49042116. [Google Scholar]
  • Nijhof WH, Baltussen EJM, Kant IMJ, Jager GJ, Slump CH, Rutten M. 2016. Low-dose CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and reduced contrast medium volume: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Clinical Radiol 71 (1): 64–73. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Ouma E, Rose K, Elias O. 2023. Statistical study for radiation dose reference levels of adult computer tomography abdominal studies in Eldoret Kenya. Int J Res Innov Soc Sci 7 (5): 1–11. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). [Google Scholar]
  • Palorini F, Origgi D, Granata C, Matranga D, Salerno S. 2014. Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 24 (2): 469–483. [Google Scholar]
  • Power SP, Moloney F, Twomey M, James K, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. 2016. Computed tomography and patient risk: facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World J Radiol 8 (12): 902–915. [Google Scholar]
  • Qurashi AA, Rainford LA, Foley SJ. 2015. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for CT trunk examinations in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Radiat Prot Dosim 167 (4): 569–575. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Salama DH, Vassileva J, Mahdaly G, Shawki M, Salama A, Gilley D, Rehani MM. 2017. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt. Phys Medica 39: 16–24. Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shrimpton pc. 2003. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 Review. NRPB-W67, 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  • Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Meeson S, Golding SJ. 2018. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK—2011 review. 2014. Public Health England. London. Wagner F, Bize J, Racine D, Le Coultre R, Verdun F, Trueb PR, Treier R Derivation of new diagnostic reference levels for neuro-paediatric computed tomography examinations in Switzerland. J Radiol Prot 38: 1013–1036. [Google Scholar]
  • Sulieman A, Alkhorayef M, Alkhaybari E, Jaafar R, Elnour A, Almujally A, Babikir E, et al. 2024. Establishment of an institutional diagnostic reference level for vascular lower extremity computed tomography angiography. Radiat Phys Chem 217: 111460. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Tins B, Oxtoby J, Patel S. 2001. Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease. British J Radiol 74 (879): 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  • Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR. 2010. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosim 142 (2-4): 244–254. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace AB. 2010. The implementation of diagnostic reference levels to Australian radiology practice. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54 (5): 465–471. [Google Scholar]
  • Zensen S, Guberina N, Opitz M, Köhrmann M, Deuschl C, Forsting M, Wetter A, et al. 2021. Radiation exposure of computed tomography imaging for the assessment of acute stroke. Neuroradiology 63 (4): 511–518. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.