EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 60 / No 3 (Juillet-Septembre 2025) Radioprotection, 60 3 (2025) 234-241 References
Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2025
Page(s) 234 - 241
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025003
Published online 15 September 2025
  • Boice J Jr., Dauer LT, Kase KR, Mettler FA Jr., Vetter RJ. 2020. Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers. Br J Radiol 93: 20200282. [Google Scholar]
  • Boice JD Jr., Ellis ED, Golden AP, Zablotska LB, Mumma MT, Cohen SS. 2022. Sex-specific lung cancer risk among radiation workers in the million-person study and patients TB-Fluoroscopy. Int J Radiat Biol 98: 769–780. [Google Scholar]
  • Borrego D, Kitahara CM, Balter S, Yoder C. 2020. Occupational doses to medical staff performing or assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiology 294: 353–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, Puglisi S, Venuti G, D’Arrigo P, Francaviglia B, Scalia M, Condorelli A, Barbanti M, Capranzano P, Tamburino C, Capodanno D. 2017. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv 10: 2488–2498. [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers CE, Fetterly KA, Holzer R, Paul Lin PJ, Blankenship JC, Balter S, Laskey WK. 2011. Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77: 546–556. [Google Scholar]
  • Ciraj‐Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ. 2010. Risk for radiation‐induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76: 826–834. [Google Scholar]
  • Dalah EZ, Mahdi O, Elshami W, Abuzaid MM, David LR, Mira OA, Obaideen A, Elmahdi HM, Bradley DA. 2018. Occupational doses to cardiologists performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures. Radiat Phys Chem 153: 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Durán A, Hian SK, Miller DL, Le Heron J, Padovani R, Vano E. 2013. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82: 29–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Elshami W, Abuzaid M, Pekkarinen A, Kortesniemi M. 2020. Estimation of occupational radiation exposure for medical workers in radiology and cardiology in the United Arab Emirates: Nine hospitals experience. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 189: 466–474. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2006. Applying Radiation Safety Standards in Diagnostic Radiology and Interventional Procedures Using X Rays. Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2014. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources. Vienna. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37: 2. [Google Scholar]
  • Kartikasari D, Nuraeni N, Sofyan H, Hiswara E. 2020. Occupational dose during an interventional radiology procedure. J Phys: Conf Ser 1436: 012050. [Google Scholar]
  • Khoramian D, Haghparast M, Honardari A, Nouri E, Ranjbar E, Abedi-Friouzjah R, Zarifi S, Anam C, Najafzadeh M, Afkhami-Ardakni M. 2024. Estimation and comparison of the effective dose and lifetime attributable risk of thyroid cancer between males and females in routine head computed tomography scans: a multicentre study. J Med Radiat Sci. 71: 240–250. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim KP, Miller DL, Balter S, Kleinerman RA, Linet MS, Kwon D, Simon SL. 2008. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures. Health Phys 94: 211–227. [Google Scholar]
  • Kwon D, Little MP, Miller DL. 2011. Reference air kerma and kerma‐area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions. Med Phys 38: 4196–4204. [Google Scholar]
  • Mettler FA Jr., Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan JL, Stabin MG, Thomadsen BR, Yoshizumi TT. 2009. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources- 1950- 2007. Radiology 253: 520–531. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreira AC, da Silva Branco AJ, Khoury HJ, Pires SR, Pereira Barbosa AH, Bitelli Medeiros R. ,2023. Cardiologist’s exposure to radiation in cath lab measured with Instadose(TM)dosimeter. J Radiol Prot 43: 011512. [Google Scholar]
  • Narendran N, Luzhna L, Kovalchuk O. 2019. Sex difference of radiation response in occupational and accidental exposure. Front Genet 10: 260. [Google Scholar]
  • Ozasa K. 2016. Epidemiological research on radiation-induced cancer in atomic bomb survivors. J Radiat Res 57(Suppl 1): i112–i117. [Google Scholar]
  • Picano E, Andreassi MG, Piccaluga E, Guagliumi G. 2013. Occupational risks of chronic low dose radiation exposure in cardiac catheterisation laboratory: the Italian healthy cath lab study. EMJ Interv Cardiol. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodman SN, Kluz PN, Hines MR, Oberley-Deegan RE, Coleman MC. 2022. Sex-based differences in the severity of radiation-induced arthrofibrosis. J Orthop Res 40: 2586–2596. [Google Scholar]
  • Şahin B, İlgün G. 2022. Risk factors of deaths related to cardiovascular diseases in World Health Organization (WHO) member countries. Health Soc Care Community 30: 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Shore RE, Beck HL, Boice JD, Caffrey EA, Davis S, Grogan HA, Mettler FA, Preston RJ, Till JE, Wakeford R, Walsh L, Dauer LT. 2018. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection. J Radiol Prot 38: 1217–1233. [Google Scholar]
  • Shubayr N, Alashban Y. 2021. Occupational radiation doses among nurses working in several medical departments in Saudi Arabia: a five-year national study. Radioprotection 56: 303–308. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. 2010. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. New York: U. Nations. [Google Scholar]
  • Venneri L, Rossi F, Botto N, Andreassi MG, Salcone N, Emad A, Lazzeri M, Gori C, Vano E, Picano E. 2009. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council’s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. Am Heart J 157: 118–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang FR, Fang QQ, Tang WM, Xu XS, Mahapatra T, Mahapatra S, Liu YF, Yu NL, Sun QF. 2015. Nested case-control study of occupational radiation exposure and breast and esophagus cancer risk among medical diagnostic x ray workers in jiangsu of China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16: 4699–4704. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.