|Publication ahead of print|
|Published online||21 April 2020|
Societal uncertainties recognised in recent nuclear and radiological emergencies
NMBU/CERAD – Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Environmental Radioactivity,
2 SCK-CEN – Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
3 CIEMAT-CISOT – Sociotechnical Research Centre, Barcelona, Spain
4 EIMV – Elektroinštitut Milan Vidmar, Ljubljana, Slovenia
5 CEPN – Centre d’étude sur l’Évaluation de la Protection dans le domaine Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
* Corresponding author: email@example.com
The paper aims to stimulate reflection and debate on the issue of uncertainty as a key component of nuclear or radiological emergency management. It identifies and discusses different types of uncertainties that appeared during and after real emergencies. For this, seven different case studies of nuclear and radiological events have been analysed using three separate methodological approaches: i) case descriptions (document review); ii) media analysis; and iii) semi-structured interviews. The overall objective was to elucidate the understanding and response to scientific and social uncertainties, and related ethical issues. A range of different uncertainties were identified and roughly grouped into categories related to: 1) technical and measurement uncertainties; 2) societal impacts and societal framing; 3) contradictory information and communication aspects; 4) ethical aspects. This analysis intends to inform emergency managers on the types of uncertainties that may appear to different actors during nuclear or radiological emergency. The results should serve to stimulate preparation on the uncertainty response and by this also to reduce some of the identified uncertainties.
Key words: social uncertainties / decisions / citizens / emergency / ethics / CONFIDENCE
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.