|Publication ahead of print|
|Published online||02 April 2019|
Inter-comparison of parameters and exposure scenarios in risk-assessment methodologies for radiological and chemical soil contamination
École nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier, 8 rue de l’École Normale,
2 Federal Agency for Nuclear Control, rue Ravenstein 36, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
* Corresponding author: email@example.com
Accepted: 25 February 2019
Various guidelines and models exist to assess the dose resulting from a radiological soil contamination. Analogous methodologies have been published to assess the chemical risk from non-radioactive pollutants present in soil. Although most of these methodologies insist on the need to use as much as possible site-specific parameters in the assessment-process, they also suggest a set of default or example parameters. In this study, we compare the suggested parameter values of four different national guidelines for risk-assessment of contaminated soil from France, Germany, Britain and Belgium. The Belgian methodology had been developed for the assessment of chemical risk while the three others are specifically dedicated to radiological risk. Significant discrepancies are found between the parameters of different national guidelines, which stresses the need for carefulness and sound expert judgment in the choice of the parameters of a risk-assessment process.
Key words: risk-assessment / contaminated site / mixed contamination
© EDP Sciences 2019
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.